Here is something to think about. Most school districts spend $15,000 a year per student. So, with 25 in a class, that is $375,000 for one class, one year. At 190 school days, that is $1,973.68 a day; round it off to $2,000 for one day.
Give the teacher $300 a day; that is $1,500 a week, for 38 weeks of work. But teachers get paid for 52 weeks, so they get 14 weeks' pay of $1,500 per week to sit at home. That is $78,000 a year — a nice piece of change for 190 days of work.
But we still have almost $300,000 of that $375,000 yet to spend. That is $1,700 to spend every day!
That would buy books and computers, heat the classroom and pay the electric bill. Why isn't this enough money? Why isn't this more money than is needed?
We could give the children the same education for a lot less money if we went back to a one-room schoolhouse with 25 kids, paid the teacher a good wage, spent far less money and ran no more school buses, as they all would walk to school.
Ronald P. Goebel
The writer is a former state representative and North Hills School District director.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Watson in 33rd
- Inconsistent Wolf
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Gross in 45th
- ObamaCare solution
- Shame on Wolf
- Keith Rothfus is the right choice
- Gun questions for mayor I
- Wolf is the right choice