| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Losing weight in Harrisburg

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Saturday, March 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Losing weight in Harrisburg

I agree with the article, “Shrinking Legislature could save Pa. $8M” (VND, March 4).

The article was about a proposed 20 percent reduction in the size of the Pennsylvania Legislature, from a total of 253 members to 203. House Speaker Sam Smith will reintroduce a bill to cut the size of the House to 153 members. This would save taxpayers not only on salaries but also money for pensions, health care, staff, travel costs and per diems. In addition, it would make the House more efficient.

If the Pennsylvania Senate needs only 50 members, why does the House need 203?

Reducing the size of the Legislature would be fiscally responsible. Every household cuts back when money is tight. The citizenry deserve no less.

I encourage readers to call, write or email their representatives and ask them to support this bill. We can do this if we try.

Joanne Fitzgerald


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Can’t believe ATI statements
  2. No PSU cover-up
  3. Boot callous pols
  4. Data misrepresented
  5. Where’s the anger?
  6. Photo ID?
  7. ‘Normal’ pitfalls
  8. WQED beyond repair?
  9. Celebrate MLK, not day of disaster
  10. End climate change
  11. The pope & child abuse