Thanks for your views
Published: Monday, April 8, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Thanks for your views
I would like to express my appreciation to the editorial staff of the Valley News Dispatch for a few things.
1. For quickly printing letters to make sure they remain topical and meaningful and for doing an excellent job in editing them. Whenever you edit my letters, I am usually pleased that you have not destroyed its substance or its overall intent.
2. For printing an editorial page that I think is rather unique. Almost all of the writers are well respected (my favorite is Pat Buchanan) and present cogent arguments with good rationale, even though for the most part, they have a conservative opinion. You are not shy about printing articles that do not always coincide with the Republican Party and its tenets.
3. You are not loath to print articles critical of your own editorial opinions.
Thank you for putting out such a great editorial page, which is not only of great quality, but does a good job of correcting the mainstream orthodoxy of the day. I look forward to reading your newspaper, and particularly the editorial page, which I feel outshines most of the newspapers and that is, perhaps, the biggest reason they are a dying breed.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Menace unaddressed
- Maybe problem is kids
- ObamaCare Obamination
- Failing patients & public
- About Quinn & Rose I
- Choosing judges I
- New Ken: Riverfront development
- SNAP cuts real, painful II
- About Quinn & Rose II
- Problems with Roenigk driver
- Privatization disastrous