| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Money's source matters

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Wednesday, March 20, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

After reading Robert J. Bush's letter “One-sided diatribe” (March 12 and comparing government assistance for laid-off Hostess workers to the recently announced Heinz executives' payoff after that company's sale, I offer the following points for consideration:

• The key difference, for which Mr. Bush offers no distinction, is that the Hostess workers are being paid with taxpayer money, not Hostess money. The Heinz executives will be paid with shareholder funds — from shareholders who are free to sell their shares in the company if they are displeased.

• While I agree that the $436 million to be paid to the Heinz execs sure sounds like a nice pile of money, when you start to head down the “that's unfair and obscene” road, it leads to a very ugly place. Who gets to decide what's fair? The government? Anybody who thinks they “deserve” more? See, the problem is, no matter what level you have achieved in society, there is always someone who believes that what you have is “unfair.”

If you think the Heinz execs' payout is unfair, I can assure you that there are millions of people in the U.S. and around the world who think that what you have is “unfair,” and as we are seeing with $16 trillion in federal debt, sometimes there just ain't enough fairness to go around.

Karl Kimmich


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. No PSU cover-up
  2. Boot callous pols
  3. ‘Normal’ pitfalls
  4. Pa. severance tax suffocating
  5. Can’t believe ATI statements
  6. Data misrepresented
  7. Updated paving needed
  8. A WQED loss
  9. Good for seniors
  10. Refugees ruse?
  11. Pipelines to the future