View the Skedel tape
How do you prove yourself innocent when you are not guilty?
Cheswick Councilman Jonathan Skedel's name has been trashed because he was judged in advance. This is because some people are not willing to make changes in a small town that is financially struggling.
Skedel is accused of punching Cheswick Volunteer Fire Co. President Joseph Ferrero. Everyone believed Ferrero.
Skedel finally got the courts to release surveillance tape of the incident. I have seen the tape and there is no doubt that this man didn't start this fight.
But who in this town wants to see the tape? No one. Why not? Skedel has contacted firefighters, but no one wants to see the tape. How do you prove yourself innocent if you can't get anyone to watch the tape?
As a community, we should want to know the truth. Let's give Jon Skedel a chance to show the community the tape and prove his innocence.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- An Obama clone
- White House not playing to win
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- Better in long run
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- Hospital’s hero & more
- Farewell, my Springdale
- Write-in alternative
- Unworthy of high office
- Working hard in fast food
- Not clean enough