Voting wait solved
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, March 23, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Colin McNickle did an excellent job in his column “Oh, the disenfranchisement!” (March 17 and TribLIVE.com) challenging Common Cause on its contention that waiting lines on Election Day are too long.
Common Cause's proposal of extending the voting time for a week before Election Day opens up a whole list of possible fraud opportunities.
This early voting must include some voter identification system involving people, money and facilities. This additional cost is not mentioned by Common Cause.
I have some good advice for the progressives who think they wait too long: To avoid standing in long lines, vote only once in each election!
Upper St. Clair
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Putin’s actions I
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Obstacles to hiring
- Drought answer?
- Apollo-Ridge excellence