Tired of gay-bashing letters
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, March 23, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Why is it always men who persist in this crusade of homophobic gay-bashing in the VND's letters section? Are they so unsure of their own masculinity?
In his March 15 letter “Be clear when criticizing gays,” Archie Atkinson whines when his naked bigotry is exposed, saying his previous remarks “were taken out of context.”
No, they weren't.
Of course, Mr. Atkinson wants everyone to know there is hair on his chest because he has the “guts to say what” he thinks. Since when does it require courage to express one's blind prejudice in a public forum? We need to end this lynch-mob mentality.
He explains his “logic regarding reproduction,” then suddenly states, “While serving in the military overseas, I was exposed in close quarters to gays, including officers, and it was a living hell.” Why was that, pray tell? Because no one was able to conceive?
Equal rights means equal rights for all — without equivocation. Nowhere in the U.S. Constitution does it say “except for sinners.”
It really is time for this inexcusable, indefensible, gay-baiting witch hunt to end.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sovereignty trampled
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Math in common?
- About those TV spots I
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Obstacles to hiring
- Springdale’s dysfunction
- Drought answer?
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obama & Reaganomics II