| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

LCB privatization bad

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Letter to the Editor
Wednesday, March 20, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

I am writing to oppose the bill to privatize Pennsylvania's state store system. This bill moved far too quickly through the legislative process with too little vetting and is the wrong approach for the commonwealth to take.

The state store system, operating more than 600 stores since the 1930s, is well run and provides the state with an unending stream of revenue. This proposal would sell off those stores and our state would recoup only about $800 million.

A one-time cash infusion in place of a steady income source is a bad long-term decision. We don't need to sell our stores, especially if the money gained can be used only once. This plan offers no permanent solutions.

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board last year contributed more than $500 million in taxes and profits and those profits continue to grow. What happens once the money raised from the store sales to private owners runs out?

Advocates argue the change will encourage competitive liquor pricing, but that has not been proven. In fact, a 2008 study by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review found liquor purchased in neighboring states was actually marginally more expensive than liquor sold in Pennsylvania. Customer convenience could also be adversely affected if stores in rural areas are forced to close.

I'm asking my fellow legislators to reject this measure. It's a shortsighted plan with the potential to do more harm than good.

Pennsylvania consumers deserve better.

State Sen. Daylin Leach


The writer, a Democrat, represents the 17th senatorial district in Montgomery County.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Catholicism & science
  2. USW not cause of ATI woes
  3. Outrageous & delusional
  4. Not one-sided
  5. States & secession
  6. Seal the borders
  7. Major issue, no action
  8. Inspiring & welcome
  9. ‘Deflategate’ fault NFL’s
  10. Bright lines: Budget battle
  11. More health-care control