Pike case shows corruption rampant
In light of the Pennsylvania Turnpike scandal, it is apparent that our state has one of the most corrupt governments in America. This reminds me of the Al Capone trial with the speculation of who the people are in the bookkeeper's log.
If the state Legislature refuses to pass turnpike reform, then maybe it's because some of their names are in the book too. The voters need to purge Harrisburg ASAP.
Gov. Tom Corbett, when he was attorney general, failed miserably on the Jerry Sandusky and turnpike issues. It seems he started a lot of investigations, but finished none. Maybe his sights were set elsewhere — something voters should remember next year.
Now PNC has been revealed as a turnpike player. Which other banks are players in these backroom antics?
I don't begrudge a business making a profit, but not at the expense of the taxpayers. Maybe the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission should be looking into this.
Were these PNC gifts declared on federal tax returns? If so, why didn't this raise a red flag somewhere? Maybe the whole country is caught up in bipartisan corruption.
Kudos to newly elected Attorney General Kathleen Kane. The breath of fresh air she brings to government is called honesty, something that's been lacking for a long time. I hope she cages the gorilla once and for all.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Scapegoating easy; solutions not
- Voters capable
- Progress not reflected
- Blame misdirected
- Pedro must go
- Steel at stake, too
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Oberdorf firing
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Duty to disclose
- Good riddance