Better use for $4M
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, March 26, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
So now we have the financially distressed City of Pittsburgh contemplating spending $4 million to install bike docking stations and fill them with 500 of the two-wheeled, eco-friendly transports (“Pittsburgh to rent bikes around the city next year,” March 12 and TribLIVE.com). What a concept.
A few questions:
Who will maintain the stations and the bikes (especially during the winter)? Sounds like hiring more city workers (with full benefits/pension, of course).
Who replaces the bikes when they are vandalized/stolen?
We don't need docking stations, as we already have them on the front of Port Authority buses — the bike racks installed a while ago, which are mostly empty at all times — and they're mobile.
Let's save the $4 million planned for bikes and spend it on converting diesel-powered buses to run on compressed natural gas. It's cleaner, cheaper, available locally and keeps U.S. money out of Arab nations' hands.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Slots & property taxes
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Conspicuous by absence
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Funding priorities questioned
- Proven success
- Putin’s actions II