In response to Michael Mayernik's letter “No marriage, no child” (March 24 and TribLIVE.com): I must simply say that I have never — in my many years — read such a distortion of the fundamental concept of marriage.
Yes, through the ages, the reason for marriage has most often been the procreation of the species.
But the “one” from the “two” is not the child; it is that moment, that instant, when two people, having journeyed through life up to that point as individuals, join together their lives and their spirits as one.
Nearly 39 years ago, a young girl from Bloomfield agreed to spend the rest of her life with me. Though we have never had children, to say that we are not married is an intolerable insult to those years.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- No ‘pass’ for Obama
- Why the difference?
- Right to veto
- Pa.’s ‘safety laws’
- Arnold must cut police force
- The next wave?
- Today’s technology
- Anti-Israel bias
- PETA & its tactics II
- Aiding our enemies
- Kill ‘Lio’