LGBT protection lacking
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, March 30, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
We stand on the precipice of the end of marriage discrimination. The U.S. Supreme Court just heard cases on both the federal Defense of Marriage Act and California's Proposition 8. Although this warms my heart, it saddens me to realize just how far behind the times Pennsylvania is on this issue.
In over half of Pennsylvania municipalities, people of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) orientation can be fired from their jobs or kicked out of their homes, with absolutely no legal recourse. The Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), which outlines protected populations within the commonwealth, does not recognize sexual orientation or gender identity/expression. As an LGBT individual, I find it ridiculous and insulting that I can be free from discrimination in Pittsburgh, but not in Altoona.
Rep. Dan Frankel, D-Squirrel Hill, and Rep. Chris Ross, R-Chester County, will be introducing a bill to amend the PHRA to be LGBT-inclusive this year. This bill has been introduced several times before and has failed every time. I hope this is the year when Pennsylvania will value the life and the work of all its residents, despite whom they love.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obstacles to hiring
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Putin’s actions I
- Putin’s actions II
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Math in common?
- Funding priorities questioned