TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

LGBT protection lacking

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Saturday, March 30, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

We stand on the precipice of the end of marriage discrimination. The U.S. Supreme Court just heard cases on both the federal Defense of Marriage Act and California's Proposition 8. Although this warms my heart, it saddens me to realize just how far behind the times Pennsylvania is on this issue.

In over half of Pennsylvania municipalities, people of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) orientation can be fired from their jobs or kicked out of their homes, with absolutely no legal recourse. The Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), which outlines protected populations within the commonwealth, does not recognize sexual orientation or gender identity/expression. As an LGBT individual, I find it ridiculous and insulting that I can be free from discrimination in Pittsburgh, but not in Altoona.

Rep. Dan Frankel, D-Squirrel Hill, and Rep. Chris Ross, R-Chester County, will be introducing a bill to amend the PHRA to be LGBT-inclusive this year. This bill has been introduced several times before and has failed every time. I hope this is the year when Pennsylvania will value the life and the work of all its residents, despite whom they love.

Beth Humphries

Bloomfield

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. ‘Climate clucker’ & proud
  2. End current pensions
  3. Cops, stars shine
  4. Council actions questioned I
  5. Disgusted
  6. Council actions questioned II
  7. Illegal gambling’s ills
  8. Keep the 90-day rule
  9. Arnold clean-up
  10. Avert further tragedy
  11. Enabling addiction