| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Better route north

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Friday, April 5, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

Better route north

The news story “T expansion could take tracks to the North Hills, cost estimate over $1 billion” (March 24 and discussed following a route that would parallel I-279 and I -79 and cost megadollars. I would like to suggest another route that might make the project feasible.

There is an active train route that crosses the Allegheny River at Washington's Landing, roughly parallels Route 8, goes close to North Park and passes through Mars, which is not far east of Cranberry. This line used to be owned by the B&O, which also had a right-of-way along the Allegheny River and what is now Washington's Landing. There are two ways that this could work:

• Perhaps Allegheny Valley Railroad would be willing to have commuter trains run on its tracks.

• Otherwise, there may be enough space along the right-of-way for another set of tracks.

The point is that following this route would serve the same people and would involve a lot less purchasing of land, moving of dirt and other construction work. The cost should be a lot closer to what federal, state and local governments can spend at this time.

Joseph Wood


Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Coal’s health hazards
  2. Hillary running hearing?
  3. Tax credit boosts jobs
  4. Hike tobacco tax
  5. Unions fire back II
  6. Council actions questioned II
  7. ATI abandoned its own
  8. Council actions questioned I
  9. Unions fire back I
  10. Unfit either way
  11. End current pensions