Ronald P. Goebel's letter “One-room efficiencies” (March 25 and TribLIVE.com) completely distorts the teacher compensation issue. As a former school director, he would be aware that teachers are paid for a contracted year, usually 190 days or more.
There is no teacher paid “to sit at home” for 14 weeks as he indicates. Although teachers in many districts have the option to take their contracted salary over 10 months, most have the salary divided over 12 months, simply for budget reasons.
Also, during summers, most teachers take continuing education credits at various schools. A master's degree takes at least two years to achieve. With 180 hours of professional development required every three years, many teachers simply elect to continue their education through various community college courses.
He states a salary of $78,000. The minimum salary for a beginning teacher in Pennsylvania is $18,500. Salaries in the range he mentions often take 15 to 20 years to achieve. That salary assumes at least a master's degree.
Finally, I'm sure Mr. Goebel is painfully aware of the cost of supplies like textbooks. Often, science, math and literature texts exceed $100 each. This does include the CDs that accompany the various publishing houses' programs. These textbooks must be adopted by school districts. These are significant factors when the cost of education is calculated.
The writer is a retired Wilkinsburg School District teacher, department chairman and assistant principal.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Not ‘too stupid’
- On right track
- Quarantine quandary
- EPA impoverishing seniors
- Ford City police
- Back to ‘Mad Men’?
- Something special
- Intelligent discussion overdue
- Know when to yield
- ‘Change’ promise kept