TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Should've been unanimous

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
 

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled to limit the ability of police to use a dog to sniff around the outside of a home for illegal drugs that might be inside.

By a 5-4 vote, the court said a government's use of trained police dogs to investigate a home and its immediate surroundings was a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Why was this a 5-4 vote? Do four justices not know the Fourth Amendment?

“A police officer not armed with a warrant may approach a home and knock, precisely because that is no more than any private citizen might do,” Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority. “But introducing a trained police dog to explore the area around the home in hopes of discovering incriminating evidence is something else,” he added. “There is no customary invitation to do that.”

The vote should have been 9-0. Those four dissenters eroded your personal liberty a bit more.

“Supreme”? At best, we should call it what it is: the court of last appeals. Leave “Supreme” to the deity.

Wait until the drones “roam on the range.”

M.S. Janosov Jr.

Robinson

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. One life’s worth
  2. Steelworkers not greedy
  3. Boy Scouts praised
  4. Taxing tobacco I
  5. More health-care control
  6. Solutions scarce
  7. Videos political tools
  8. ATI: Leave retirees alone
  9. Indict ’em all
  10. Bad Clinton decisions
  11. Exiting Wal-Mart