Alcoa '29' a landmark
Published: Wednesday, March 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I'm writing in regard to the article “Alcoa's ‘29' getting new life” about the old Alcoa Research Lab in New Kensington. I am currently employed at the Alcoa Technical Center in Upper Burrell in my 45th year. I worked at the New Ken Plant starting in 1968 and in all of the buildings at the old research site prior to moving to the technical center.
The department I originally worked for moved to Building 29 around 1974 following the closing of the New Ken plant. Most of 29 was remodeled at that time and all of the main floor was restored to its original beauty, including refinishing the inlaid oak-paneled rooms with a “special formula varnish.”
It's sad to see this facility in its current condition, but encouraging to know that someone still appreciates the value in its restoration. If nothing else, the main building — 29 — should be designated as a national historic landmark.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ObamaCare Obamination
- Maybe problem is kids
- Menace unaddressed
- Choosing judges II
- Promotion questionable
- Privatization disastrous
- Forcing their beliefs
- Leave ‘God’ out
- Prevailing wage downsides II
- Prevailing wage downsides I
- Fearful homogenization