Drop social issues, GOP
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, April 1, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Drop social issues, GOP
In his column “Who killed the New Majority?” (March 27 and TribLIVE.com), Pat Buchanan is right about one thing: The GOP must face reality or continue to lose.
The Republican Party is standing still and defending old ideas and old ways while the rest of the world moves on. New ideas about immigration, globalization, climate change, women's health issues and gay rights have already moved forward.
The world is changing and it's happening faster than ever before. We as a nation need to get it together and start moving ahead or be left behind.
When I became a Republican, it was because the GOP was the party of educated, forward-thinking people who cared about the future of our economy, modernization, new ideas and innovative technology.
Now, the GOP is the party of the religious right, the protector of old, established big money and the party of war. All of these issues are pushing more and more people away from the GOP.
I believe the Republican Party can come back and be the party of business, technology, science and education, but to do that, it must be a more inclusive party.
The GOP needs to move away from the social issues that divide people and stick to the issues of jobs and the economy that unite all citizens.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Cover many stances
- Dingell’s lesson
- Tragedy’s ramifications I
- Tragedy’s ramifications III
- Resurrection? Really?
- Paying for ‘Fayette’s Folly’
- Deer Lakes drilling OK
- Stabbings reveal heroics
- Valley musical superb