Regarding the news story “Comcast bars gun, weapons advertising” (March 27 and TribLIVE.com): This decision by Comcast had little to do with integrity. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, through his Mayors Against Illegal Guns effort, had $12 million to throw at this campaign and basically outspent the gun advertisers.
To find any substance in this thought process, Comcast would have to refuse advertising dollars from alcohol producers by associating them with DUI fatalities.
And by the way, don't ever expect Comcast to accept any responsibility for violent programming that incites the mentally unstable to do unthinkable things.
Guns are inanimate objects. Violence is an emotion. Guns are not capable of committing violence without the human element.
As for gun laws: As with all laws, only the law-abiding will comply.
This was just shameless pandering by Comcast.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Affordable’? Not for him
- Arnold’s garbage
- Pass GMO label bill
- ATI’s broken promises
- Protesters not law-abiding
- Thinly veiled disdain
- Wrong on immigration II
- Helping the horses
- Right on race
- Report reactions II
- PNC: New roles for helpers