By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, April 4, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Regarding the news story “Proposal targets anonymous lawsuits” (March 28 and TribLIVE.com): State Rep. Tim Krieger, R-Delmont, claims to be a defender of the Constitution and a fiscal conservative. Yet he has no problem wasting time and money on an obviously unconstitutional ploy such as this nonsense?
If he wants to fight religious causes, he should resign his seat and become a theologian.
If he wants to continue as a state representative, he should do so. Here are a few suggestions as to how.
Work on issues like homelessness, veterans affairs, providing health care for our citizens who cannot afford it, helping to put food on the table for children who live below the poverty line, maybe raising employment numbers in our region.
Then, instead of keeping the Ten Commandments carved into a stone in a public place, he could actually appear to be someone who lives by them.
Work on some real issues for your constituents, Rep. Krieger — there are plenty to choose from.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Proven success
- Drought answer?
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Orwellian redefinitions
- Keep Laurel Point
- Funding priorities questioned