By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, March 31, 2013, 11:20 p.m.
In response to the letter “Customer Service” in the March 29 VND: I have had a completely different experience at Wal-Mart. My experience at the Natrona heights Wal-Mart has been positive.
For example, there are two men in the produce department who are very helpful. One always asks me what I am looking for. Just yesterday, I asked another man if he had a particular item. He responded that the truck just came in and he would check. He was restocking vegetables at the time.
On another occasion, I called customer service from home because I thought I left an item at checkout. This Wal-Mart employee walked down to the checkout station and back to the customer service desk to tell me the item wasn't there. It turned out to be in the trunk of my car.
Last week, I went to the Wal-Mart electronics department to purchase an iTunes card. I couldn't find the cards and asked the young man working there for help. He was very patient in showing me where they were. I had walked past them twice.
Whether it's a big box store or a small retailer, business is tough these days. Employees are constantly asked to do more with less. A smile, a prayer and a “thank you” go a long way.
Donna Roland McGinnis
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Drought answer?
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Orwellian redefinitions
- Keep Laurel Point
- Funding priorities questioned
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Ukraine & history