'Book of Mormon' offensive
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, April 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Re: The play “The Book of Mormon,” being presented by PNC Broadway Across America at the Benedum Center: I have never been so appalled by a show.
I have been attending these shows since they were at the Civic Arena and this was the worst I have ever seen. The dancing and music were good and that's it.
The language was atrocious, including repeated use of an obscenity. There were girls getting female circumcisions and Jesus Christ being ridiculed and called an epithet. The young men who were Mormon disciples were alluded to as being gay.
This play is absolutely horrific and I am deeply offended. I'm sure Mormons, blacks and Christians also were offended.
I am a Roman Catholic and proud of my conservative views. This was not a family show and should have been performed in a dark cellar for sick people, not families. There were several young children in the audience.
There was no advance warning or notice about the offensive language. Had I known, I would have never attended this show. If there were a rating for this show, it would be “X.”
It is no wonder that our young people have no respect for life, women or people of other faiths and cultures. The sponsor, PNC, should be ashamed of the show it presented.
Connie M. Rusek
A version of this letter was sent to PNC.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Drought answer?
- Saved her life
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- Wildlife & humans
- Conspicuous by absence
- Consistently unflattering
- What competition?
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Thanks to firefighters
- Corbett’s budget claim