Abortion & taxes
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, April 6, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Abortion & taxes
I know what it's like for a woman to struggle to support two daughters on a retail salary. I saw my mother do it for years, facing the hardship of being her family's primary breadwinner when her disabled husband could not work. She counted every penny — and every red cent she sent to Uncle Sam.
She did not want those hard-earned dollars to be spent on abortion. And poll after poll shows she was hardly alone. A 2009 Quinnipiac University poll showed 70 percent of American women do not want public funding of abortion through the new federal health care program. Currently, 21 states have passed legislation opting out of abortion funding under the health insurance exchanges created by the health care law.
Pennsylvania needs to do the same, for all those women who work a full shift, then jump into their cars to work a second, unpaid job caring for children, grandchildren or aging relatives. They are financially strapped, and the last thing they want is the government to use their money to fund the abortion industry.
The writer is the legislative director for the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Medicaid’s future
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Putin’s actions I
- Beneficial, irreplaceable