See 'FrackNation' free
If you're from Pennsylvania, no doubt you've heard of the Marcellus shale. You've heard about the jobs created, the billions of dollars in royalties and taxes and the benefits of energy independence that shale gas makes possible.
But you've also heard from activist groups telling tales of flaming faucets and other colorful anecdotes. A perfect example is “Gasland,” the “documentary” in which an uneducated and controversial director from Manhattan claims to chronicle incidents of contamination. The movie was misleading and outright deceitful.
Phelim McAleer, an internationally renowned journalist, saw the movie as well. Determined to get to the bottom of the claims, McAleer hit the road, spoke to landowners and ended up with a beautiful, funny and moving film, “FrackNation” ( fracknation.com). It masterfully exposes the lies of Manhattanite Josh Fox and his band of well-to-do celebrities, and the struggling farmers who have to deal with the fallout.
“FrackNation” was funded by thousands of individual donations through Kickstarter.com . Its cinematography is gorgeous, its stories touching, and McAleer is charming. There is a free showing at 7 p.m. on Thursday at the Indiana Theater in Indiana, Pa. McAleer is hosting the event, and there will be a Q&A session afterward.
Michael S. Knapp
The writer is vice president of land and public relations for MDS Energy Ltd.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Positive & healthy ...
- Thanks for the coverage
- Ferguson & contradictions
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- Russia, not Rice
- More answers, please
- Sticker shock
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- Hiring in Westmoreland I
- Article painted wrong picture
- Blame judges