Earned, not 'welfare'
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, April 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
To Jack Markowitz: I would like to ask how you came to the conclusion that Social Security is a part of “the modern Welfare State” in your column “Land of the free, home of the taxed” (April 4 and TribLIVE.com).
If not for the thieving politicians who have occupied Washington for the last 40-plus years, Social Security would be a self-supporting program for many decades to come. The fact that $3 trillion from the Social Security trust fund was squandered by these vultures for their own political gain is seldom mentioned.
I have paid into Social Security since 1969, and yes, I will be “entitled” to my benefits when I begin to collect at age 62. Please, Jack, don't call my hard-earned benefits “welfare.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Resurrection? Really?
- Tragedy’s ramifications I
- Tragedy’s ramifications III
- Tragedy’s ramifications II
- Dingell’s lesson
- Deer Lakes drilling OK
- Dems’ tax myth
- Cover many stances
- Stabbings reveal heroics