The new Whigs?
The new Whigs?
Several letter writers have decried the so-called “liberal” media giving conservatives a bad name. I think conservatives do just fine on their own on that point.
If they continue on the same path, the GOP may become the next Whig Party. By representing the 1 percent and railing on most of the rest of society, it could soon become extinct.
Saying no to everything is not leadership nor is it good for our country. A writer told us that recessions drive growth. When I was getting my “liberal” education at UCLA, I must have been sick the day we were taught that. But it's good to know: More recessions equal more growth.
Another writer told us how great the “Roaring ‘20s” were under President Calvin Coolidge. The author failed to mention the ‘80s, when the only things that roared were government spending/big deficits and scandals like the savings and loan crisis and Iran Contra.
President Bushes I and II were great. They destroyed more jobs in 12 years and racked up more government spending than we could imagine. Maybe we should elect another Bush (Jeb?) in 2016 so he can mess things up leading to the 2020s, which might roar like the ‘20s of old Silent Cal.
I need to get back to Fox News — the only “fair and balanced” news I can find.
John Emery West Jr.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Good riddance
- Punishment pushback II
- Punishment pushback I
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Incomprehensible? That’s Obama
- Beware this Wolf I
- Unite on this