Flunking this 'test'
Published: Saturday, April 20, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Does anyone else find the drug-testing debacle for Westmoreland County employees disheartening (“Westmoreland commissioners announce drug-testing policy for prospective employees,” April 9 and TribLIVE.com)? Over the past several months, the county has sent some of its leaders, not to mention other Pennsylvania leaders, out in different communities of the county to do drug-awareness seminars. Yet the vast majority of Westmoreland employees have never been tested for drug use.
Now the county is scrambling to make amends. While the rest of the United States has struggled for so many years with an abusive prescription and illicit drug culture, most Westmoreland County employees have enjoyed a magical bubble of trust.
The after-the-fact explanations only diffuse the blame, just like all of the drugs diffusing throughout the county.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Unconstitutional funding
- Forgetting troops
- Roenigk stands for safety
- About Quinn & Rose II
- Prevailing wage misunderstood
- Praise undeserved
- Arbitrary & chaotic
- About Quinn & Rose I
- Ferlo & Natrona
- Lobster-tail tale
- Closer to closure