ShareThis Page

Professional baseball?

| Sunday, April 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Disgraceful as was the now-infamous brawl between the San Diego Padres and Los Angeles Dodgers, occurring just four days before the pageantry set for Chavez Ravine for Jackie Robinson Day, this is overshadowed, in part, by Major League Baseball's failure to take such incidents seriously.

It is shameful that the instigator of the incident, Carlos Quentin, was suspended for a mere eight games, particularly given that the man for whose injury he is responsible, Dodgers' ace pitcher Zack Grienke, will miss at least two months of his first season with the Dodgers with a broken collarbone.

I am not a fan or admirer of Grienke, whom I find to be a cocky and arrogant young man. But neither Grienke nor any other player deserves to be seriously injured within play for any reason. Additionally, the example that this sets for young, impressionable fans is putrid.

If Quentin believes that Grienke has been throwing at him, the worst means of handling the situation is to violently charge the mound, creating chaos and mayhem on the field.

If Major League Baseball wished to end bench-clearing brawls, it could easily do so. My idea would be to suspend for 60 days without pay any individual who initiates or joins a fight.

The ugly spectacle witnessed in Los Angeles is no way for players of “America's Pastime” to behave. There is no place for thuggery in this great game. Shame on Commissioner Bud Selig for displaying the attitude of “boys will be boys” by dispensing taps on the wrist to the offenders.

Oren M. Spiegler

Upper Saint Clair

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.