Published: Sunday, April 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium has decided to remove the African painted dogs to give the community “time to heal,” according to zoo President Dr. Barbara Baker, following Maddox Derkosh's death last November (“Pittsburgh Zoo will permanently close African painted dogs exhibit,” April 10 and TribLIVE.com).
It took only five months to reach this logical conclusion?
I was disappointed to learn that the zoo's planned Top of the World Project could include painted dogs in the future. Aren't there enough other animals to showcase? In my opinion, the old exhibit was poorly designed and tempted parents to raise their children up to get a better view. The catch fence installed created a false sense of security and was, unfortunately, in place to protect the dogs — not the visitors.
And remember the calendars that went out featuring the dogs? Bad decision after bad decision, both before and after Nov. 4, 2012.
We have heard time and again how this was the first “visitor” fatality at the zoo. Let's not forget trainer Mike Gatti, an elephant keeper at the zoo, was killed just days shy of a decade before Maddox, something that has received virtually no attention since this latest incident.
Something smells funny at the zoo. Maybe the air will be fresher at the Top of the World.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Choosing judges I
- Prevailing wage downsides II
- Choosing judges II
- Lies and disrespect I taught …
- ‘Chained’ sellout
- Valid comparison?
- Prevailing wage downsides I
- Hero at rest