By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, April 18, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
I've worked in a doctor's office in Tarentum for the past 20 years. Other than numerous medical offices, the Rite Aid and a few restaurants, I wouldn't call Tarentum a thriving town full of shoppers on foot.
With that said, I can't understand the need for all of the construction going on now to widen many sidewalks, mostly on Sixth Avenue and Lock Street. Most of the people patronizing the few establishments in Tarentum drive there.
And although the new sidewalks may look beautiful, what is the point if they are making the surrounding streets narrower? Now, when you turn off the Tarentum bridge onto Sixth, you are risking an accident due to oncoming traffic because the new sidewalks make the street extremely narrow.
If Tarentum had actual shopping and entertainment like all small towns did many years ago — but never will again — the new, wider sidewalks would be justifiable. They're not justifiable now. They're simply making it more dangerous for drivers.
If the borough is so concerned about making the town look better, why not plant some big, beautiful trees along the sides of the unattractive railroad tracks?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Ukraine & history
- Funding priorities questioned
- Proven success
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- Saved her life
- What competition?
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Keep Laurel Point