U.S. laws based on God's law
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, April 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Re. Amesh A. Adalja's letter “God, gays & the Constitution” (April 11): We all know people have their own “opinions” about these topics. Mr. Adalja writes of the Constitution, not the Bible, being the law of the land. What? America was founded on the principles and laws of God. Let me quote the word of God: “Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord, the people he chose for his inheritance. Psalms 33:12, 18.
We ignore God and his commandants at our peril. Families, institutions and whole cultures crumble when they ignore God. All of our problems are rooted in our choice to ignore God and his laws. Ponder this quote from the French philosopher Albert Camus: “I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is.”
People will always disagree about current topics, but Adalja's statement that we don't live in a theocracy — where the word of God is law — is just plain ignorance. Read the Bible and make your choices: “For as a man thinks in his heart, so is he” (Proverbs 23:7) and “He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not ... the wrath of God abides on him” (John 3:36).
We will be judged by God for the choices we make when we pass from this life. Only God has the power and right to judge. He looks at our heart.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Not reviled abroad
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Harmar needs better enforcement