Say no to FLAG
Say no to FLAG
Re. the news story “New look around town” (April 12): It stated the Freeport-Leechburg-Apollo Group is asking the state to approve a $6,700 grant for restoration of facades of privately owned buildings in Leechburg.
Our Armstrong County commissioners last week approved sending FLAG's application to the state Department of Community and Economic Development. This paves the way for your tax dollars to be used for private renovations.
I often receive requests in the mail to help disabled veterans I am told cannot feed their families. We see devastated souls locally who have no shelter. But the owner of Ulmer Entertainment and the owner of the former Veterans of Foreign Wars building — now occupied by Farmers Insurance — believe it is my responsibility to supply dollars for renovation on their property.
Our Armstrong County commissioners should have taken a stand against this corporate welfare maneuver and voted against the FLAG application. And our state legislators should stop funneling our scarce dollars for these unnecessary, money-draining requests.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Not clean enough
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- Renaming in order?
- Confidence in our courts
- Wolf’s taxes
- Tarentum demolition
- Not for expressway
- GCC 19, sportsmanship 0
- Lying time of year
- ‘PC’ Ebola approach deadly
- Better choice