Share This Page

Traffic enforcement for profit

| Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 2:33 p.m.

Pennsylvania House Transportation Committee Chairman John Rafferty, R.-Montgomery, can take his steaming pile of new road taxes, put them in his hat and pull it down over his ears. Rep. Rafferty didn't notice (and what's to notice at his pay grade?) there's still a recession and the average serf — I mean Pennsylvanian — is having a devil of a time making ends meet.

What does Rafferty think will happen when $100 surcharges are added to traffic citations? We'll see stepped-up traffic enforcement for profit. We'll see an army of speed-trappers bringing home the bacon for PennDOT and the Turnpike Commission, which will then shovel money into their construction cronies' pockets like asphalt into a bottomless pothole.

There is more than enough money to repair all of the roads and bridges and build new highways to ease the current congestion. But in Pennsylvania., road taxes must also pay for cute little parks, museums, jogging and bike paths, and the biggest waste of our money — public transit.

Chairman Rafferty, please stop spending our money on non-highway projects.

Tom McCarey

Berwyn, Chester County

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.