| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Conservatives should conserve

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Saturday, May 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

In regard to the editorial “EPA favors: Aid too far” (April 15 and, there's a reason “conservation” and “conservative” are related words: Both involve honoring what our ancestors left us and preserving it for future generations.

Democracy, privacy and the rights guaranteed us in the Constitution are civic traditions that we must honor and preserve. But conservatism should also extend to our natural resources, especially water.

Large industrial livestock operations produce hundreds of millions of tons of animal waste each year that all too often end up in our waterways. This is bad news for the people who live downstream of these operations, as well as for fishermen, sportsmen, beachgoers and the many small businesses that rely on them.

Congress passed the Clean Water Act to protect these Americans. The Environmental Protection Agency must enforce this law — and that starts with keeping track of where the animal waste in our public waterways is coming from.

Eric Rosenquist

Squirrel Hill

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Pope & peace
  2. Can’t believe ATI statements
  3. The pope & child abuse
  4. Honoring a brother
  5. Good for seniors
  6. Home, sweet home?
  7. Pipelines to the future
  8. A WQED loss