GOP represents more than 1 percent
This is in response to the letter “The new Whigs?” (April 18). Contrary to liberal belief, the GOP does not represent only 1 percent of the population. Protecting society, the sanctity of marriage and constitutional rights are things in which more than 1 percent of the population believes.
The party does not say “no” to everything, only the things being taken away that are important to most Americans. Liberals propose restrictions on guns in the name of Newtown. But what will such legislation actually achieve? They limit the number of bullets, but not the number of clips one can carry. And those who don't buy guns legally — will they abide by these new restrictions?
The writer harps on Reagan and the Bushes for economic downturns. But he forgot the ‘70s under Carter — long lines for gas, our “national malaise” — and the inflated growth of the ‘90s with Clinton. The Democrats control the White House and the U.S. Senate and we have high unemployment and a record number of people receiving federal aid.
You can blame Republicans for any number of things. Just don't blame them for wanting a country that supports itself and trying to do everything they can to rebuild that dream most of us have for our kids' future.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Failing city, Steelers
- Even bigger waste
- Football tab ‘incomplete’
- Holder no help President Obama …
- Oberdorf firing
- Raise minimum wage
- Bill to relieve suffering
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- He’d kill the golden goose
- The ‘Tree of Agitation’
- Few on these buses