Cyclists, share rules, costs I
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, April 26, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
The news story “Filling gap in Great Allegheny Passage could bring more cyclists to Pittsburgh” (April 22 and TribLIVE.com) quotes Eric Boerer, Bike Pittsburgh advocacy director, as saying, “There's nothing Downtown that really says, ‘Welcome cyclists.'” It seems like such a shame these so-called “cyclists” will have to pay attention as they try to navigate the City of Pittsburgh.
If they had to prove they were qualified to be on the road in the first place, things might be different.
Share the rules! I believe these “cyclists” should be required to:
• Register their bicycles with their state(s) of residence
• Display valid license plates on their bicycles
• Carry proper state minimum insurance coverage
• Be state-tested and have driver's licenses with “bicycle endorsement”
• Have their bicycles pass annual state inspections requiring proper headlights, brake lights, turn signals and horns, and display state safety inspection stickers on their bicycles
• Obey all traffic signs, signals and “rules of the road,” including speed limits.
No bicycle lane? When's the last time you saw a motorcycle lane?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Valley musical superb
- Deer Lakes drilling OK
- Resurrection? Really?
- Tragedy’s ramifications II
- Seek not vengance, but love
- Tragedy’s ramifications I
- Resurrection is real
- Off the rails
- Women, equality & religion II