Appalled by 'Pippin'
I recently attended Valley High School's presentation of the musical “Pippin” and I must say that I was appalled with the production.
The sexual innuendos and use of profanity were completely unnecessary. I believe the line was crossed when the youngest member of the cast swore when calling Pippin a name. There was an audible gasp from the audience.
The use of profanity is not tolerated in the hallways at Valley. Why was this deemed appropriate for a school play?
These words/actions teach disrespect to our kids. Our society is facing a generation of kids who want to be friends with their teachers. There seems to be no role for authority in today's society.
Now, our school administration has just proven to the student body that respect is not required all of the time. Why is it necessary to send mixed messages to our kids?
Some may think the sexual innuendos were above a child's understanding and I can appreciate that opinion. But there were two small children sitting behind me.
One scene in the play had Pippin's grandmother tell a joke with sexual undertones. The audience laughed, and I heard a little voice say: “What's so funny? What does it mean?” This was definitely not a family-friendly production.
I have watched previous productions at Valley in amazement and fascination.
I am upset with the school administration first and foremost for allowing this production of Pippin to be performed by our impressionable youth.
Secondly, I am upset with the production staff for selecting and encouraging this type of behavior and language from our kids.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Animal abuse
- Poisoned long ago
- Food for thought
- Appreciate caregivers
- Bible under attack
- Ford City police
- The real big spenders
- Trophy shot trumps learning
- EPA not the problem
- Thankful this holiday