Community spirit in action
Armstrong County is a beautiful area. The majority of residents appreciate the natural beauty our county has to offer. It's unfortunate that some don't.
Whereas the majority sees Armstrong County as a picture, there are some who see it as a trash can. I am appalled and disheartened at the trash that I see along our roadways, in our fields and on our riverbanks.
However, there is a ray of hope. This past Sunday as my wife and I were walking down Pine Hill Road, we met a group of Kittanning High School football players and their coaches. This group, organized by Turney Luke, was picking up bottles, cans, food wrappers, tires and other litter carelessly tossed out the windows of passing vehicles or dropped by pedestrians. My wife and I applauded their efforts and thanked them for their service.
Not only are men like Turney Luke, Frank Fabian, Larry Robb, Eddie Morris, Brad Bowers, Jamie Paul and Earl Kline, from Kittanning Hose Co. 1, volunteering their time to perform a public service to our community, they are also teaching a group of younger citizens a valuable lesson in community pride. This lesson is being conveyed by actions, not words.
After a week of seeing the worst of human tragedy from Boston to Waco, it was refreshing to see the human spirit at its best in our community. We thank all those volunteers for not only restoring a roadway but also for restoring our spirits.
One final request: Honor the efforts of those volunteers: Next time, dispose of trash in its proper place. It really is quite simple if you think about it.
Ed & Susan Bower
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.