Focus misplaced I
In regard to Michael Hasch's news story “Boy on bicycle struck by SUV in Point Breeze” (April 23 and TribLIVE.com): It was shocking to read that a father watched his little boy get hit by a car, but the focus was on how the driver was feeling instead of the victim and his family.
For example, a neighbor is quoted as saying, in reference to the driver, “That poor woman. I want to go put my arms around her,” with no reaction toward the tragedy itself.
Also mentioned was how the driver was sobbing, making no mention of how the boy's family reacted.
The story was clearly sympathizing with the driver, even though a child was hit riding his bicycle on a residential, tree-lined street next to a park.
I would be devastated if it were my son who was hit while riding his bike with me after school, only to read a story that focused more on the driver's feelings than the tragedy that struck my family.
It's sad that a beautiful residential street with trees, homes, a park and shared-lane markings for bicycles isn't even safe enough for a family out riding on a spring day.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ambrosini’s logic lacking
- Better stores needed
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Wolf is the right choice
- Treat UNC like PSU
- Superstition’s role
- Intelligent discussion overdue
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Have mercy
- Picking our pockets