Time to start profiling
President Obama has acknowledged the Boston Marathon bombing was a terrorist attack, but he and the liberal press still insist the Tsarnaev brothers acted as “lone wolves” and there was no wider conspiracy. They also avoid using the words “Islamic” or “Muslim” when referring to them.
I believe the bombers were Islamic radicals with ties to the larger terrorist community. That means the bombing could have been planned by a larger terrorist cell and the brothers just carried out the last act. Maybe they were not lone wolves.
Obama is sympathetic to Muslim causes, as he does not want to offend his Muslim brothers. He rarely connects the words “Islamic” or “Muslim” with the term “radical terrorist,” but they should be connected. Obama is in denial — the Islamic radical terrorists are growing bolder and more Americans will die.
We have a tool to fight this scenario — profiling. It works; let's use it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- It’s not personal
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Amendment levels playing field
- Buffer zones needed II
- Off base on Chatham prez
- Getting bad advice
- Diplomatic difference
- Seeking Christ in kids
- Cockpit safety stalled