By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, May 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
It seems that the Republican Party is very successful in alienating the majority of Americans.
The latest example is the statement by U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, one of the most notorious tea partyers. He said President Obama used the Newtown parents as pawns in the gun debate.
Pawns? These people lost their children to a horrific act of gun violence. They had every right to go to Congress and plead their case for background checks.
In a display of greed, fear and cowardice, the majority of Republicans and four Democrat senators allowed themselves to be pushed around by the NRA and voted against background checks. They are the real pawns.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Putin’s actions I
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Obstacles to hiring
- Drought answer?
- Beneficial, irreplaceable