Share This Page

Mourning his hometown

| Monday, May 6, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Mourning his hometown

One of the worst things that happened to Tarentum was the closing of Tarentum High School. The town lost its identity.

Having grown up in Tarentum (1933-1950), I call it my hometown. I enjoy reading about it through the Internet.

At one time, in the Valley Daily News newspaper, there was a column titled “Around the Valley” or something else close to that. I am now 83, have been gone from Tarentum since about 1950 and have traveled the world in the course of military duty. I look back upon those days of grade school and high school (1936-48) with fond reflection.

Tarentum High School had Dreisher, Ernie Hefferle, “Hack” Holliday, Jack Clark, “Buster” Warringer, Floyd “Dixon” Anthony, all great and good athletes. West Tarentum (my area) was a source of athletic prowess for the high school.

I doubt if you asked anyone where the Tarentum Opera House was located that they could tell you, but we did have one: corner of Corbett Street on the side where the “Greeks” diner was located.

Perhaps there are persons who would contribute an article every so often to keep alive the history and good times of Tarentum. In 1948 or 1949, Tarentum held its centennial and a great time was had by all. People were proud of their community.

From what I read now, the “Valley” (Tarentum, Brackenridge, the Heights, New Ken, Arnold) is nothing but a shooting gallery and a drug enclave.

What has happened to the pride people take in their community? Are the inmates running the asylum?

John Gilboux

San Antonio, Texas

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.