Guilty as 'charged'?
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, May 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The new charge by the Pennsylvania Turnpike is not the sort that comes with continuously increased fees. This charge is for installing charging stations for electric cars (“Turnpike adding electric car charging stations,” April 24 and TribLIVE.com).
Let the Turnpike Commission explain the following.
The two most popular electric cars are the Nissan Leaf and Chevy Volt, which cost $24,000 to $42,000. I have never seen one except in a showroom.
On a full charge, their range is 80 miles to 120 miles. Driving from Pittsburgh to Harrisburg would require three or four charges.
With a 120-volt outlet, charging time is eight hours; at 240 volts, four hours. That changes a four-hour gasoline-powered journey to a 12-hours-plus battery-powered journey.
That Pittsburgh-to-Harrisburg drive would require a stop time of 12 hours at 240-volt charging stations. What would the charging cost be?
The commission plans to install charging stations along the entire length of the turnpike. If it has facts that are unknown, let it address this letter.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Islam & women
- Invest in pre-K
- Corbett’s choice
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Medicaid’s future
- Drought answer?
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Ukraine & history
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Slots & property taxes
- Conspicuous by absence