FEMA awards valuable
FEMA awards valuable
Thank you for making the public aware of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Individual and Community Preparedness Awards in “The Thursday wrap” (April 25 and TribLIVE.com). However, I feel the Trib missed the mark.
The FEMA awards recognize outstanding individuals, organizations and municipalities that work to make our communities safer, stronger and better prepared for any disaster or emergency. One has only to look at events of the last few weeks — the Boston Marathon terrorist bombings, the West, Texas, fertilizer plant explosion, and severe flooding in the Midwest — to understand what these awards represent. These devastating incidents caused tragic loss of life and property, caused a large metropolitan area to go into lockdown, and forced thousands to evacuate homes and businesses.
The awards are an opportunity to recognize the selfless actions not only of dedicated first responders, many of whom are volunteers, but of ordinary citizens who acted in the face of danger, helping those injured and coming to neighbors' aid.
At the Westmoreland County Department of Public Safety, we commend FEMA for bringing attention to these unsung heroes and hope these awards will encourage other citizens and communities to respond in kind.
Michael F. Brooker
The writer directs the Westmoreland County Department of Public Safety.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Give thanks for vets
- Bible under attack
- For their own benefit
- Family first
- No new stadium for Kiski
- Gruber, then & now III
- Enforce immigration laws
- Quarantine quandary
- Postal questions
- Revisionism now
- Gruber, then & now II