Why is Balla running?
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, May 10, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
I usually get a sense of why an individual runs for public office — sometimes it's community pride, sometimes it's the money. New Kensington Council members get $500 a month — not a lot of money.
So why is Ron C. Balla running for our council on May 21?
I'm concerned because I don't believe Balla would give up his $50,000-plus-a-year job with the New Ken Water Authority for a part-time position paying $6,000. City Solicitor Anthony Vigilante has told Balla that Pennsylvania's third-class city code prohibits a city authority employee from being on council. So if Balla wins, he will have to quit his job prior to being sworn in as a council member.
What is so special about the council position that a person would give up a good job with great benefits — four to five weeks of paid vacation, free health insurance, lots of paid sick days and holidays — for one with very little pay and no benefits?
What am I missing?
The Rev. Cecil Smith
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Funding priorities questioned
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Drought answer?
- Saved her life
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Ukraine & history
- Obama & Reaganomics I