Will of the people
As I traveled all across Pennsylvania in April, I heard countless people tell me they do not want taxpayer funding of abortion.
It's no surprise.
CNN and Quinnipiac polls show a strong majority of Americans, including most women, don't want public money to be spent on abortion. State House Bill 818 is the will of the people.
The bill would stop elective abortion funding in our state health insurance exchange, which will be created by the Affordable Care Act.
Unless House Bill 818 passes, the commonwealth will be in the abortion business next year, reversing Pennsylvania's longstanding policy against public funding of abortion.
The writer is education coordinator for the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation (paprolife.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Majority defied
- Missile defense, not talks
- Positive & healthy ...
- Ferguson & contradictions
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- Thanks for the coverage
- Russia, not Rice
- More answers, please
- Sticker shock
- Full higher-ed disclosure