Jambalaya & VND baloney
I read with disbelief your April 25 article “Thank Marcellus shale drillers for the good jambalaya in Pa.”
It is amazing you would find the space to print an article about the cuisine of the Marcellus drillers, but disregard the overwhelming information that should be printed about the devastation being caused by these drillers to our state's water, soil and air, not to mention the health problems suffered by those close to the drilling.
You continue to ignore the consequences of Act 13, which precludes local zoning of this industry and allows drilling and its polluting activities near homes, schools, etc. The consequences of this law are certainly more important to your readers than promulgating the eating habits of the drillers.
We saw the catastrophe in West, Texas, when a fertilizer factory blew up in a residential area. Pennsylvania residents will be open to the same type of misfortune should Act 13 be allowed to stand.
But VND readers, do not fret: Your paper will continue to keep you uninformed and filled with more of the gas industry's hot air.
And it is clear from the article that the jobs promised by the gas industry to Pennsylvanians continue to be held overwhelmingly by out-of-state residents. The industry's touting of job-jobs-jobs is just more Marcellus baloney being shoved down our throats.
Shame on the VND for aiding and abetting this illusion.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.