Local zoning essential
The importance of local zoning for Pennsylvania communities came into clear view recently when a fertilizer plant blew up in the Texas community of West. The plant was in a residential area and the destruction of homes and lives, as well as injuries, was staggering.
Here in Pennsylvania, we are flirting with similar disaster since the passage of Act 13, which stripped local governments of their ability to regulate gas drilling. Act 13 allows drilling, frack pits, compressor stations and other dangerous and polluting aspects of the industry even in residential areas, next to homes, schools, hospitals, etc.
Although Commonwealth Court ruled such aspects of Act 13 unconstitutional, our Machiavellian Gov. Tom Corbett appealed that ruling to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, where a decision seems to be deadlocked. The governor is preparing to stack the deck and nominate a seventh justice in hopes that the tie will be broken in favor of the gas industry, even though this seventh justice will never have heard the arguments before the high court.
It seems our governor knows no bounds to deception, deceit and chicanery! Pennsylvania residents must be alerted to Corbett's political machinations and demand from their legislators the right of local municipalities to retain zoning powers to protect citizens from the kinds of disasters that can occur when a dangerous industry moves into a residential area. Without local zoning to protect us, we are all in grave danger!
The writer is a member of Citizens Against Marcellus Pollution.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bible under attack
- Postal questions
- Family first
- Gruber, then & now III
- Voting insanity
- Right on Promise
- Gruber, then & now II