Forgetting veterans by Tuesday
Veterans are honored with monuments — symbols to remind us that freedom is not free but paid for in blood. Those who served offered up their lives in the name of freedom. We remember their sacrifice always — but especially on Memorial Day.
For many, the battle is not over. The wars of Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, Iraq and Afghanistan burn deep within us. Many suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, diseases caused by Agent Orange exposure or dust inhalation from explosives. Some veterans' wounds aren't obvious, like an amputee's, but they are no less debilitating.
Soldiers, sailors and airmen submit claims to the Veterans Affairs administration for benefits, providing hundreds of pages of evidence to prove their disabilities. The VA offers little assistance in how to locate the evidence, leaving the veteran on his or her own. Many are denied benefits because they served on missions that remain classified. These records should be made available.
Congress does nothing about this. Bills are introduced but fail to pass, often because of the cost involved. We who served are not worth the dollars, we're told. Yet there are dollars for myriad worthless pork projects.
Do not our veterans deserve to be helped by our government?
Yes, the politicians will offer praise and promises to help our veterans tomorrow, only to forget by Tuesday.
Legislators: Do your job and pass bills to help our veterans in need.
John J. Bury
Media, Delaware County
The writer is retired from the Navy and is a Vietnam veteran.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.