By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, May 10, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Bryan Kline has set the performance standard for Westmoreland County row officers. Since taking office four years ago, he has turned the clerk of courts' office into a hardworking entity, handling the administrative functions for the county's criminal court system.
He promptly created administrative cost hearing procedures that generate a half-million dollars annually for the county treasury and crime victims, and obtained case fees — saving taxpayers those expenses. Kline instituted online payments of costs, fees, fines and restitution, collecting over a million dollars that otherwise might not have been collected. County prisoners now pay 20 percent of their inmate accounts toward restitution — another program Kline started.
Degrees in criminal justice, law and public policy make Kline well-educated for his position. Professionally, he chairs the county committees on records improvement and collection enforcement and is a member of the Restitution in Pennsylvania Task Force.
We are fortunate to have a principled, highly qualified and accomplished clerk of courts. In one term, he's made the office extremely productive while protecting victims' rights and saving taxpayers very large sums. On May 21, our choice is clear: Re-elect Bryan Kline as our clerk of courts.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Funding priorities questioned
- Ukraine & history
- Proven success
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- What competition?
- Metcalfe wrong
- Lebo’s coyotes
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Conspicuous by absence