Guns a public health issue
Published: Sunday, May 19, 2013, 11:20 p.m.
It is becoming increasingly clear that the issue of gun safety should no longer be left in the hands of our Congress. Gun manufacturers and their political contributions completely control the votes of many legislators. All it takes is a well-placed lobbyist with money from rich gun manufacturers and a checkbook to corrupt a politician's objectivity.
Decisions about gun safety should be handled by people who are objective, well-informed and immune to monetary persuasion. This clearly does not describe the current U.S. Senate.
These life-and-death decisions about gun safety should be in the hands of public health professionals because this is a public health issue. We must listen to our eminently qualified public health professionals who have studied the issue for years. They know, for example, that more guns do not make us safer. This is a fact — not a random anecdotal story that proves nothing — based on significant data collected and analyzed by experts.
Many think we need to replace Congress members who vote so irresponsibly on gun bills. I say take the decision out of their hands and give it to the people who understand it — our public health professionals
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ACA deserves support
- Hunt where the deer are
- Harming, not improving
- Handled it well
- Remember Pearl Harbor
- About time for Gilpin
- Lies and disrespect I taught …
- Ethanol’s benefits
- Nukes, not hoops
- Forcing their beliefs
- Valid comparison?